From: Kenichi Handa <handa@etl.go.jp>
Cc: schwab@suse.de, monnier+gnu/emacs@RUM.cs.yale.edu, rms@gnu.org,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [simon.marshall@misys.com: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?]
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 20:58:04 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200202251158.UAA02048@etlken.m17n.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 25 Feb 2002 13:04:53 +0200 (IST)
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2002, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> I don't think that revert-buffer should autodetect at all.
> IIRC, that's what it does now: it uses the value of
> buffer-file-coding-system to decode the file.
??? The words after ":" is correct, thus the words before
":" is wrong.
It uses the value of buffer-file-coding-system, thus it does
NOT autodetect the encoding.
Of course, C-x RET c undecided M-x revert-buffer will force
Emacs autodetection.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
handa@etl.go.jp
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel
next reply other threads:[~2002-02-25 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-25 11:58 Kenichi Handa [this message]
2002-02-25 12:07 ` [simon.marshall@misys.com: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?] Eli Zaretskii
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-02-25 7:01 Kenichi Handa
2002-02-25 7:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-02-25 10:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-25 10:31 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-25 11:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-25 14:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-02-25 15:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-26 20:13 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-26 20:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-27 5:50 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-25 7:25 ` Miles Bader
2002-02-25 9:56 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-26 20:13 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-26 20:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-26 22:44 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-27 5:50 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-27 15:08 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-02-28 4:08 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-27 10:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-02-23 20:19 Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200202251158.UAA02048@etlken.m17n.org \
--to=handa@etl.go.jp \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@RUM.cs.yale.edu \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).