From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch to cus-edit.el Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 17:09:14 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200202250009.g1P09Eu15684@aztec.santafe.edu> References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014596148 12258 195.204.10.66 (25 Feb 2002 00:15:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 25 Feb 2002 00:15:48 GMT Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16f8nz-0003Bc-00 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2002 01:15:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16f8lN-0005Zy-00; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 19:13:05 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16f8hf-0005Hp-00; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 19:09:15 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g1P09Ju00847; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 17:09:19 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g1P09Eu15684; Sun, 24 Feb 2002 17:09:14 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: abraham@dina.kvl.dk In-reply-to: (message from Per Abrahamsen on Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:20:03 +0100) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1495 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1495 In general, is it necessary to ask for permission to commit small improvement to the customize specifications like this? That is, adding :group and :link entries to defcustoms, or improving :type entries? Not at all--please just go ahead and do them. There's no need to send mail about it afterwards, either. These changes are uncontroversial, and I have confidence that whatever you do of this sort is right. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel