From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: [simon.marshall@misys.com: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer?] Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:19:58 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200202232019.g1NKJw414656@aztec.santafe.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014495881 6737 195.204.10.66 (23 Feb 2002 20:24:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Feb 2002 20:24:41 GMT Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16eiim-0001kZ-00 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:24:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16eigi-0000PO-00; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 15:22:32 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16eieG-00008F-00; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 15:20:00 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g1NKK1u13897; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:20:01 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g1NKJw414656; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:19:58 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: handa@etl.go.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1468 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1468 I tend to think he is right. What do you think? ------- Start of forwarded message ------- X-VirusChecked: Checked From: "Marshall, Simon" To: "'Emacs Pretest Bug'" Subject: FW: [21.1.90]: should coding be recalculated on revert-buffer? Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 15:09:45 -0000 In GNU Emacs 21.1.90.1 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6, GNU/LessTif Version 2.1 Release 0.93.3) of 2002-02-04 on ashanti configured using `configure --prefix=/rvcarma/marshals/slash/usr/local - --x-includes=/usr/openwin/include:/rvcarma/marshals/slash/usr/local/incl ude:/rvcarma/marshals/slash/usr/local/include/X11 - --x-libraries=/usr/openwin/lib:/rvcarma/marshals/slash/usr/local/lib:/rv carma/marshals/slash/usr/local/lib/X11 --with-x-toolkit=motif' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: en_UK value of $LC_CTYPE: en_UK value of $LC_MESSAGES: C value of $LC_MONETARY: en_UK value of $LC_NUMERIC: en_UK value of $LC_TIME: en_UK value of $LANG: en_UK locale-coding-system: iso-latin-1 default-enable-multibyte-characters: t If I visit a DOS-format file in Emacs on a Unix box, Emacs helpfully tells me the coding system is DOS in the modeline. If I use dos2unix in a shell to convert it and M-x revert-buffer in Emacs, Emacs still tells me the coding system is DOS. Shouldn't it revert the coding system as appropriate too? ------- End of forwarded message ------- _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel