From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Should invisible imply intangible? Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:19:50 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200202232019.g1NKJoG14638@aztec.santafe.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014495846 6704 195.204.10.66 (23 Feb 2002 20:24:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Feb 2002 20:24:06 GMT Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16eiiE-0001k2-00 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 21:24:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16eig7-0000Mg-00; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 15:21:55 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16eie7-00007X-00; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 15:19:51 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g1NKJru13873; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:19:53 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g1NKJoG14638; Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:19:50 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1465 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1465 A few weeks ago I made some changes that result in sensible cursor motion behavior for invisible, intangible text. However, invisible text which is not intangible tends to give strange behavior. Meanwhile, the buffer-invisibility-spec feature makes it easy to control invisibility of parts of the text, but not intangibility as well. What would people think of making invisible imply intangible? Is there any practical use for text which is invisible but not intangible? _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel