From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: mode-line-inactive and face inheritance Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:07:37 -0500 Message-ID: <200202221607.g1MG7bb30294@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <9003-Sat16Feb2002095527+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200202181524.g1IFOe210109@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200202192130.g1JLU5s13034@aztec.santafe.edu> <200202192253.g1JMrRt18194@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200202220431.g1M4VhD13855@aztec.santafe.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014394270 4520 195.204.10.66 (22 Feb 2002 16:11:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Feb 2002 16:11:10 GMT Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, eliz@is.elta.co.il, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16eIHt-0001Ao-00 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 17:11:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16eIGL-0006N8-00; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:09:33 -0500 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16eIEU-0006DH-00; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:07:38 -0500 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1MG7bb30294; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:07:37 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Richard Stallman Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1427 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1427 > > Also it allows nesting of display-specific specs > > so you can extract the common part of the `light' and `'dark' > > settings for `color' displays. > > > > That seems too complex; I think I would not want to document this > > even if it worked. > > I'm ambivalent about it. I think it could also make things simpler. > > I am thinking about documenting this, and it seems complex, so I think > we should do without it. Could explain what's complex about it ? Stefan _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel