From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Proposal to make font-locking easier to understand Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 21:30:50 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200202220430.g1M4Uob13738@aztec.santafe.edu> References: <5lit8utokh.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200202192132.g1JLW2V13292@aztec.santafe.edu> <200202192225.g1JMP1e18069@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014352481 15200 195.204.10.66 (22 Feb 2002 04:34:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 22 Feb 2002 04:34:41 GMT Cc: monnier+gnu.emacs.bug/news/@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, acm@muc.de Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16e7Ps-0003x4-00 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 05:34:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16e7OU-0003k4-00; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 23:33:14 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16e7MB-0002P6-00; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 23:30:51 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g1M4Uru02665; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 21:30:53 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g1M4Uob13738; Thu, 21 Feb 2002 21:30:50 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu In-reply-to: <200202192225.g1JMP1e18069@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1405 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1405 I doubt we'll be able to find names that are better enough to justify the hassle of changing them. I think the renamings just proposed are good ones. We should make those changes, if nobody suggests better ones. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel