* Re: Proposal to make font-locking easier to understand [not found] ` <5lit8utokh.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu> @ 2002-02-19 21:32 ` Richard Stallman 2002-02-19 22:25 ` Stefan Monnier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Richard Stallman @ 2002-02-19 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: emacs-devel, acm I agree that the names aren't very enlightening, but I think it's a bit late to change them. Why do you think so? Few people know this terminology anyway, so it seems to me we have little to lose by changing it. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Proposal to make font-locking easier to understand 2002-02-19 21:32 ` Proposal to make font-locking easier to understand Richard Stallman @ 2002-02-19 22:25 ` Stefan Monnier 2002-02-22 4:30 ` Richard Stallman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Stefan Monnier @ 2002-02-19 22:25 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: monnier+gnu.emacs.bug/news/, emacs-devel, acm > I agree that the names aren't very enlightening, but I think it's a bit > late to change them. > Why do you think so? Few people know this terminology anyway, > so it seems to me we have little to lose by changing it. I doubt we'll be able to find names that are better enough to justify the hassle of changing them. But that's only my hunch: I won't oppose a change just for the sake of it. Stefan _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Proposal to make font-locking easier to understand 2002-02-19 22:25 ` Stefan Monnier @ 2002-02-22 4:30 ` Richard Stallman 2002-02-22 16:06 ` Stefan Monnier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Richard Stallman @ 2002-02-22 4:30 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: monnier+gnu.emacs.bug/news/, emacs-devel, acm I doubt we'll be able to find names that are better enough to justify the hassle of changing them. I think the renamings just proposed are good ones. We should make those changes, if nobody suggests better ones. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Proposal to make font-locking easier to understand 2002-02-22 4:30 ` Richard Stallman @ 2002-02-22 16:06 ` Stefan Monnier 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Stefan Monnier @ 2002-02-22 16:06 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: monnier+gnu/emacs, monnier+gnu.emacs.bug/news/, emacs-devel, acm > I doubt we'll be able to find names that are better enough > to justify the hassle of changing them. > > I think the renamings just proposed are good ones. I didn't bother to reply to that part of his message, but I didn't find them too hot. I'll have to check the original message again. Stefan _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-22 16:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <chfl4a.p5.ln@acm.acm>
[not found] ` <5lit8utokh.fsf@rum.cs.yale.edu>
2002-02-19 21:32 ` Proposal to make font-locking easier to understand Richard Stallman
2002-02-19 22:25 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-02-22 4:30 ` Richard Stallman
2002-02-22 16:06 ` Stefan Monnier
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).