From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ChangeLog and unification Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:31:08 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200202192131.g1JLV8813172@aztec.santafe.edu> References: <7263-Sat16Feb2002100210+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200202181706.g1IH6ii10640@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014154471 7444 195.204.10.66 (19 Feb 2002 21:34:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Feb 2002 21:34:31 GMT Cc: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE, schwab@suse.de, eliz@is.elta.co.il, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16dHuA-0001vy-00 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 22:34:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16dHtp-00051X-00; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:34:09 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16dHqw-0003ge-00; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:31:10 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g1JLVAu17000; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:31:11 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g1JLV8813172; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 14:31:08 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@RUM.cs.yale.edu In-reply-to: <200202181706.g1IH6ii10640@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@RUM.cs.yale.edu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1341 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1341 I really think unify-on-encode should be turned ON by default because I still haven't heard of any reasonable scenario where it can do anything undesirable. Does anyone see a reason not to do this? _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel