From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: save-match-data's return value Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:45:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20020219164058.B203.LEKTU@terra.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1014133724 24052 195.204.10.66 (19 Feb 2002 15:48:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Feb 2002 15:48:44 GMT Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16dCVX-0006Fq-00 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:48:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16dCV1-0006lG-00; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:48:11 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16dCSF-0006da-00 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:45:19 -0500 Original-Received: from jbarranquero (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g1JFjHY22976 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2002 16:45:18 +0100 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-BkRandomSig-Folder: 3ade7ea7.mb\Emacs\Emacs-Devel\ X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.07 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1323 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1323 save-match-data is implemented via unwind-protect and progn; however, its docstring does not make any reference regarding the value returned after its execution, though presumably it'll be the last form in BODY, as in with-temp-buffer, et al. Is that a part of the interface of save-match-data, and should be documented, or does it specifically *no* guarantee about the value it returns? /L/e/k/t/u _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel