From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: "Stefan Monnier" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Type of max_specpdl_size and max_lisp_eval_depth Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:42:46 -0500 Message-ID: <200202152242.g1FMgkd25616@rum.cs.yale.edu> References: <200202142240.g1EMeaj19682@rum.cs.yale.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013813860 31462 195.204.10.66 (15 Feb 2002 22:57:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 15 Feb 2002 22:57:40 GMT Cc: "Stefan Monnier" , Eli Zaretskii , Richard Stallman , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16brIR-0008BM-00 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 23:57:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16br6O-0008SG-00; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:45:12 -0500 Original-Received: from rum.cs.yale.edu ([128.36.229.169]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16br47-0008N9-00; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:42:51 -0500 Original-Received: (from monnier@localhost) by rum.cs.yale.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g1FMgkd25616; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 17:42:46 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Original-To: Andreas Schwab Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1187 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1187 > "Stefan Monnier" writes: > > |> So if someone could try it out on a 64bit system... (a comparison of > |> `gcc -Wall' output before and after the patch might be helpful, > |> although I doubt it). > > Here is what I have found by compiling on ia64-suse-linux: Does that mean that compilation fails with my patch unless you additionally apply the patch you attached ? Stefan _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel