From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs dumps core using gnus Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:10:54 +0200 (IST) Message-ID: <200202141110.NAA29106@is.elta.co.il> References: <200202111848.g1BIm7Z06906@aztec.santafe.edu> <1858-Mon11Feb2002215711+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200202131537.g1DFbuD08656@aztec.santafe.edu> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013685849 32205 195.204.10.66 (14 Feb 2002 11:24:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Feb 2002 11:24:09 GMT Cc: elf@ee.ryerson.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16bJzk-0008NF-00 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:24:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16bJoa-0006XV-00; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 06:12:36 -0500 Original-Received: from is.elta.co.il ([199.203.121.2]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16bJng-0006Gs-00; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 06:11:40 -0500 Original-Received: (from eliz@localhost) by is.elta.co.il (8.9.3/8.8.8) id NAA29106; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:10:54 +0200 (IST) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-reply-to: <200202131537.g1DFbuD08656@aztec.santafe.edu> (message from Richard Stallman on Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:37:56 -0700 (MST)) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1128 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1128 > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:37:56 -0700 (MST) > From: Richard Stallman > > > Can it be done by seeing which files are present in the directories > > that would be searched? > > Sorry, I'm not following: what files did you have in mind? > > The shared library files. They have the version numbers in the file name. That doesn't seem to be reliable enough: the library produced from version 4.1.0b1, the one where the bug is fixed, libungif.so.4.1.0, the same as with version 4.1.0, where the bug is present. And then there's the case of static libraries, which don't have the version numbers in their names. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel