From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Type of max_specpdl_size and max_lisp_eval_depth Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:12:03 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200202140312.g1E3C3C09104@aztec.santafe.edu> References: <9003-Wed02Jan2002183452+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <200201091815.g09IFpL08127@rum.cs.yale.edu> <200202121940.g1CJeEo08435@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013657290 12196 195.204.10.66 (14 Feb 2002 03:28:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Feb 2002 03:28:10 GMT Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16bCZ7-0003Ac-00 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 04:28:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16bCMZ-0006Dd-00; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 22:15:11 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16bCJY-0005sx-00; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 22:12:04 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g1E3C3u16574; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:12:03 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g1E3C3C09104; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:12:03 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: monnier+gnu/emacs@RUM.cs.yale.edu In-reply-to: <200202121940.g1CJeEo08435@rum.cs.yale.edu> (monnier+gnu/emacs@RUM.cs.yale.edu) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:1104 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:1104 As a matter of fact, I think we should just go ahead and turn all those vars to EMACS_INT. Here is a patch that does just that (untested since I only have access to systems where EMACS_INT = int). Any objection ? On principle, I have no objection. I don't know if there is some technical problem hiding in the change. _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel