From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Juanma Barranquero Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: lost argument and doc string Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:34:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20020211173214.3AA9.LEKTU@terra.es> References: <20020210.152812.01367344.Takaaki.Ota@am.sony.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013446001 15766 195.204.10.66 (11 Feb 2002 16:46:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Feb 2002 16:46:41 GMT Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16aJbE-00046C-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:46:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16aJR2-0003dF-00; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:36:08 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.22.27.141] (helo=mail.peoplecall.com) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16aJPE-0003Uj-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:34:16 -0500 Original-Received: from jbarranquero (jbarranquero.ofi.peoplecall.com [62.22.27.143]) by mail.peoplecall.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g1BGYDl27609 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:34:14 +0100 Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-BkRandomSig-Folder: 3ade7ea7.mb\Emacs\Emacs-Devel\ X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.00.07 Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:997 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:997 On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 07:48:57 +0200 (IST), Eli Zaretskii wrote: > This _does_ seem Windows-specific, because I cannot reproduce it, and > also because another user of the Windows version reported a similar > problem with what looked like a perfectly valid DOC file. I'm certainly seeing the same problem, even after nmake bootstrap (on a Windows XP, with a MSVC-compiled Emacs 21.2.50). > Is it possible that the change in the way doc strings are put in C files > confuses the Windows port, either the make-docfile program or Emacs > itself? Maybe, but then why some docstrings can be seen just fine? /L/e/k/t/u _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel