From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: PATCH: focus follows mouse in C Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:08:59 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <200202110208.g1B28xC06540@aztec.santafe.edu> References: <200202071456.g17EujV04572@aztec.santafe.edu> <200202082324.g18NON305738@aztec.santafe.edu> <6480-Sat09Feb2002120145+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013393992 11664 195.204.10.66 (11 Feb 2002 02:19:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Feb 2002 02:19:52 GMT Cc: eliz@is.elta.co.il, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 16a64O-000320-00 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2002 03:19:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16a5ul-0000SM-00; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:09:55 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16a5ts-0000IO-00; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:09:00 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA11484; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:08:59 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g1B28xC06540; Sun, 10 Feb 2002 19:08:59 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: Pavel@Janik.cz In-reply-to: (Pavel@Janik.cz) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:967 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:967 Yes, now I finally understand your and RMS' point. I agree and I think that it should default to behaviour described by you. I think that when I have two windows and point is in the bottom one and I do C-x o, small mouse movement (still in bottom window) should not (by default, but user should be able to change it) select the bottom window again. This should be it (module cus-start.el etc. changes): With this change, do you like the results better? Is it a convenient feature now? _______________________________________________ Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel