From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: quimby.gnus.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Save Options vs. default-input-method
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:57:06 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <200202071457.g17Ev6P04620@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <m3665k6ayy.fsf@Janik.cz>
	<200201302237.g0UMb1d24844@aztec.santafe.edu>
	<m3sn8jbzs6.fsf@Janik.cz>
	<200202040927.g149RUF02434@aztec.santafe.edu>
	<m3ofj5fs5i.fsf@Janik.cz> <rjbsf57anr.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk>
	<200202051248.g15CmDb02207@aztec.santafe.edu> <rju1svzxxx.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: quimby2.netfonds.no
X-Trace: quimby2.netfonds.no 1013094511 16624 195.204.10.66 (7 Feb 2002 15:08:31 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby2.netfonds.no
NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Feb 2002 15:08:31 GMT
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby2.netfonds.no with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 16YqA2-0004K1-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Thu, 07 Feb 2002 16:08:31 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16Yq20-0001sV-00; Thu, 07 Feb 2002 10:00:12 -0500
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16Ypz1-0001US-00; Thu, 07 Feb 2002 09:57:08 -0500
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA13542;
	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:57:07 -0700 (MST)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g17Ev6P04620;
	Thu, 7 Feb 2002 07:57:06 -0700 (MST)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: abraham@dina.kvl.dk
In-reply-to: <rju1svzxxx.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk> (message from Per Abrahamsen on
	Tue, 05 Feb 2002 17:38:02 +0100)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.5
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: quimby.gnus.org gmane.emacs.devel:848
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:848

I think we are having a miscommunication.  You argued that it is wrong
to use custom-save-all for the options menu.  I said your argument was
convincing and I agree.  Then you went ahead and rewrote the options
menu to use custom-save-all.

Did you think I had rejected your argument?

_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
Emacs-devel@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel