From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: add etc/PROBLEMS entry for building 32-bit exe on 64-bit system Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:14:15 -0500 Message-ID: <1r1wm2iqqw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <8yslein0f3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168460107 18703 80.91.229.12 (10 Jan 2007 20:15:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 10 21:15:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H4jqe-0007CE-Nn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:15:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4jqe-0000KT-C5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:15:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H4jqS-0000KI-JR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:14:48 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H4jqS-0000Jy-04 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:14:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4jqR-0000Ju-Qa for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:14:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H4jqR-0003uN-Fy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:14:47 -0500 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1H4jpw-0006Jf-2z; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:14:16 -0500 Original-To: Andreas Schwab X-Spook: rail gun Commecen Ron Brown genetic Yukon SSL USDOJ INSCOM X-Ran: L$+{Q2d3cW-YiO\M-Rs+:qA#nD0!$7zi5@kNg%F._1Pga4be:!P+oA5K!cm%K-6&xUUan[ X-Hue: white X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Wed, 10 Jan 2007 21:00:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65125 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab wrote: > CC is not handled differently from CFLAGS, both in the shell and in the > makefile. I'm not entirely sure what that statement means, other than it will in fact work and not look for "gcc -m32". Which I did not doubt (I see in the make info pages that 'The "name of a program" may also contain some command arguments'), I just personally find it an odd way of doing things. I guess it has the advantage of not needing to set LDFLAGS as well.