From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Artur Malabarba Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New ELPA policy proposal Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:25:17 +0000 Message-ID: <1oi611bywb6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ziyuaqhl.fsf@petton.fr> <87fv0labbf.fsf@web.de> <87y4eda0kl.fsf@petton.fr> <22074.42230.156669.584780@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <87ziyoxvdp.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <83k2psnzyh.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvuorz7n.fsf@gmail.com> <8337wfon3f.fsf@gnu.org> <56401834.8080402@yandex.ru> <87611bh19q.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <85ziyn9nuv.fsf@iznogoud.viz> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447086361 27255 80.91.229.3 (9 Nov 2015 16:26:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 16:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Oleh Krehel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 09 17:25:56 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvpGQ-0005Xs-8W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:25:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53820 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvpGP-0002g3-Ed for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 11:25:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43380) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvpG0-0002fy-4u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 11:25:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvpFw-0004UC-2g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 11:25:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]:32804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZvpFv-0004U0-RD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 11:25:20 -0500 Original-Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so88737906wme.0 for ; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 08:25:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=QJHdJxuz4K3pJD/gmuseX/n0zfuoDq0m0ESPSkBthJc=; b=Fc+aNwWrXQySdaaUJMnQOb8NxC9I3UJFnCo8LnhxoKQQVLgh1GQnPpYo+8ZAzpFR1p iIWtL/UOjb+7L/0Y+6agD7UWr6zNMTok0Biw7z8h1/LilLeRM6qqEsSWSX6uQ5+x//cT GM1Wr6HCMVcqlxFR8fEwMuvggZbD9Ab4kDJj0wJ47XTmYHQ8Hz6lVyXDeqUv6Mjie5+7 nYRYFjOlms/zzEpw/1oxKEaSogNU8TrA2/+mZMQuw9GKmuhK91U1y86p4HBi8COgHyvB 3AjH1leKEJMCvKHpvVy4TNQ3rXIjf1pGaOjPX4A+ny+b7ICxzZ2PCbLoiMw7hVrS9lUk /IDg== X-Received: by 10.28.23.206 with SMTP id 197mr28429327wmx.88.1447086319328; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 08:25:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from it055607.gmail.com (it055607.users.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.30.198]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id it4sm16253938wjb.0.2015.11.09.08.25.17 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Nov 2015 08:25:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <85ziyn9nuv.fsf@iznogoud.viz> (Wolfgang Jenkner's message of "Mon, 09 Nov 2015 16:41:07 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193724 Archived-At: Wolfgang Jenkner writes: > So, a policy of minimal control would have bundled code in emacs.git > (and nowhere else), while elpa would be merely a staging area for it. I'm not sure if I understand you correctly. But Gelpa code will always be available online, regardless of whether we bundle it into Emacs releases or not. So Gelpa is not a staging area, and the code that goes into it does need to be under our control.