From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFE] Migration to gitlab Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:50:12 -0400 Message-ID: <1g1s2ylp5n.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <1552789070.5272.1@yandex.ru> <1552791707.5272.2@yandex.ru> <1552793646.5272.3@yandex.ru> <1552821396.21432.0@yandex.ru> <83imwhwf4x.fsf@gnu.org> <837ecvux2q.fsf@gnu.org> <9c7cf558-a2d3-951e-d6e1-31b3ad5900cf@yandex.ru> <1553248918.28810.1@yandex.ru> <8336nfrq50.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhpnq8ka.fsf@gnu.org> <87va0a514h.fsf@gmx.de> <87zhpmj18k.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="121263"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 22 19:52:47 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h7PHZ-000VRB-QX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 19:52:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33384 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7PHY-0005ey-My for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:52:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53534) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7PGw-0005ef-Hf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:52:07 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:48130) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h7PFC-0008Sw-5b; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:51:48 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1h7PF7-0005qb-Fl; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:50:14 -0400 X-Spook: basement Phreaking USDOJ Outbreak DRM Somolia 9/11 Sonora X-Ran: JX@6XGXBQZ*{V=hNbe=(36gD{W9D/)LvJy'iQeJniexz+.Zl X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <87zhpmj18k.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Fri, 22 Mar 2019 17:57:31 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:234618 Archived-At: Michael Albinus wrote: >> FYI [PATCH] in the subject is treated the same as "Tags: patch". > > Thanks, I didn't know (or I did, and forgot). Maybe it's worth to > mention this in admin/notes/bugtracker? Nobody reads the docs, else they would use Tags: patch. Hence the addition of [PATCH] support years ago. And nobody pays special attention to reports with patches. (Obviously I exaggerate.) https://debbugs.gnu.org/rrd/emacs_tag_5y.png Yrs grumpily...