From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Daniel Colascione" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Per-window face support Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 12:25:32 -0700 Message-ID: <1dedb08954732c4e59b8c3f61e13dc7c.squirrel@dancol.org> References: <5e08587a56ad528599ed5fb259be6335.squirrel@dancol.org> <83muw5vdtr.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhzvyqfy.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgbezs6q.fsf@gnu.org> <6b522145569975d52266e29e8122e86b.squirrel@dancol.org> <50a1e0f98f6cfc5e55fdc2b7df5000b5.squirrel@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1529263450 21130 195.159.176.226 (17 Jun 2018 19:24:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2018 19:24:10 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN] Cc: Daniel Colascione , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stefan Monnier" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 17 21:24:06 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fUdHO-0005KN-T6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 21:24:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56198 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUdJW-0000rZ-6f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 15:26:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42181) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUdIs-0000qv-SH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 15:25:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUdIr-000547-II for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 15:25:34 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3]:44604) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fUdIr-00053v-5g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 15:25:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Cc:To:From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID; bh=lR7QOoRcdhw1PHY4HMuBryFk7h0HQZn/i8YjY9ewU1g=; b=DniswdaQ1aG8LVnDCrVnp7OtniRM+JO5KbR4nvdZ/hKCWjxBGFFGBs9m+6qo3Wn8SdRqLKsCj9s5Q3wkR+FxAAknwZObNE7jMHvXMHrKAXjwdjwn/fCz/ykENF2XeRWdEQbfv93QVQxqDUypPyarONAyk0PyhZfk9tBWtbSs7QlNiwDsRzmkQSXGQ1nVjEu9EFskSn/wC6SW96w4lcJL2Pb03wHJzJ0YFQBui0+FqfOmf8T0cJMV/rb/tXHAm7QNAuCd+S7VnbKo733Qk1JtNRCB8VSoVfeu83BG7d5yMTO5+1I99qW947d+zA6QTQr4bZIxqIeNAIUPq6bcvhvM4w==; Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=dancol.org) by dancol.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fUdIq-0000Sg-9I; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 12:25:32 -0700 Original-Received: from 127.0.0.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user dancol) by dancol.org with HTTP; Sun, 17 Jun 2018 12:25:32 -0700 In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fedf:adf3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:226425 Archived-At: >> I think that ship sailed a long time ago. Almost everyone uses eq for >> integers, > > That's OK. We can (and probably should) > > (defalias 'eq #'eql) > > without any significant performance impact. Doing such a > > #define EQ EQL > > in the C code might be too costly, which I why I suggest to do this > bit-by-bit. That's even worse, because now eq will mean different things depending on whether a routine is implemented in C or Lisp, and Lisp would have no way to do _real_ object identity comparisons. This isn't a problem we need to solve so clumsily.