From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: while-no-input Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:02:59 +0100 Message-ID: <1B3ACCFD5694A94DBA4E231402B0E9ED57AEC6@mucmail1.sdm.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101740648 23315 80.91.229.6 (29 Nov 2004 15:04:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 15:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 29 16:03:56 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CYn4F-0001Yc-00 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:03:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CYnDc-0003PY-Op for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:13:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CYnDT-0003OP-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:13:27 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CYnDS-0003Ne-CS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:13:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CYnDS-0003NU-6H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:13:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.76.162.229] (helo=world1.sdm.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CYn3O-0002te-CX; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 10:03:02 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=world1.sdm.de) by world1.sdm.de (MTA) via esmtp id 1CYn3N-0003Lf-TG; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:03:01 +0100 Original-Received: from mucns1.muc.sdm.de ([193.102.180.22]) by world1.sdm.de (MTA) via esmtp id 1CYn3N-0003LZ-2H; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:03:01 +0100 Original-Received: by mucns1.muc.sdm.de (MTA) via esmtp from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=sdmmail1.sdm.de) id 1CYn3N-0006kW-0i; Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:03:01 +0100 Original-Received: from mucmail1.sdm.de ([193.102.180.175]) by sdmmail1.sdm.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 29 Nov 2004 16:03:00 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: while-no-input Thread-Index: AcTWI35UPs5/l/uSSd+3114Fd0BDVwAAPk2w Original-To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Nov 2004 15:03:00.0237 (UTC) FILETIME=[8470D3D0:01C4D624] X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:30491 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:30491 Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> Don't forget that the code within while-no-input is usually code >>> that was not specifically designed for while-no-input (otherwise it >>> would already use input-pending-p instead). >=20 >> Hmm, are you sure about that?? >=20 > About what? about "that the code within while-no-input is usually code that was not specifically designed for while-no-input (otherwise it would already use input-pending-p instead)"... but it seems that i have misunderstood your latest posting.... >=20 >> IMHO the code within while-no-input can also be code which would use >> input-pending-p already, so my example with performing a >> VC-state-check=20 >=20 > I never said otherwise, did I? >=20 >=20 > Stefan