From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:44:47 +0200 Message-ID: <19c1ec9e-a97f-a8ab-b966-edadbc299c39@yandex.ru> References: <831ba60af0cbfdd95686@heytings.org> <87mtuxj8ue.fsf@gnus.org> <9088e12cb3de3d30abf1@heytings.org> <8735wnjsum.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg4n9jei.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2efhx3e.fsf@gnus.org> <838s6f9g5d.fsf@gnu.org> <87y2efgg3w.fsf@gnus.org> <878s6fgdzu.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36606"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.1 Cc: gregory@heytings.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas , Lars Ingebrigtsen , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 22 23:45:39 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lOTIp-0009Lq-PT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 23:45:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40068 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOTIo-0006xE-RK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:45:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34296) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOTI7-0006Uh-7Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:44:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x332.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::332]:52221) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lOTI5-0002kf-GN; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 18:44:55 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x332.google.com with SMTP id p19so10037813wmq.1; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:44:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AdAjfbVvRKkLkw63IghjMjDXyv3UcL7k71d1c2VhYo4=; b=EH4lzRqNxXsK7wlQTa8UwnH+EO91No+rr4/TSy06xiD6ATvVfqidUNGWP9eiXdV+nw hqZawVL1kVJUAI+I8xYL9UAA8+5P0TYG3DzNfjb8dQ2MV5zKYVAFnk0nrAUlsVNR7Zmv 3O1iQWFVbV2sMAjunXzBmmuzNt6Bjqwecnp+/8WcNBAXVsYTCh5QnF51UunzKUeXyRh9 ul+Gw9cti1S67zj8+2k/QVD//24YkO+sWJSIjzwtjCY+bXdHBl2yifnB9L8b+dQ1zO56 QZ+La0i97hQabl1huN1qgYeXAG+06ChfOIzoCg5/GFlT+2nVvFimc5y7vRlVoY85XARk Lg/g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AdAjfbVvRKkLkw63IghjMjDXyv3UcL7k71d1c2VhYo4=; b=JnjY66msEot2tKeEnf4JMuwZPY4MYqmNxcH74j82dEo2k9/k5w2lf4EFx9oizr6Qsz tiMMrc0S12OyrCzcNZy92vjZA75HDy1dPauTYQha4xIymkI1rmooZUHpQM4S67Hd7y3+ p8/hCuPD8eXf9q1JfYDNXKnUiQRJovPJKZfDsdS3ZRqdec5wehiw897L3elIW/K0I2p+ me/OWsTiIpHe1Td091t4WrPEUKpkgzBSDqrjV/npqPPcOc07enIm4q3X7OWOaqXymyv2 uRaBQk2J1cbzqzZF017CbtD3K7hU8Hu76NQJFpSU1r/HuVT4eDktB1ykfTS2Pj5dqqSJ +WRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530XcvKZz8WFIFPHhNXky3Jwx1fLxrOE96vi+GS94M43i/UYGZXM V926yGTuoxtlZYD9FKeJzDnlghFhAvU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziSgZcGZslAJ12gDu0NHHH7KA/gin2dvGRyNIW9Ibl4GJHWtnm1+xkZtYUbyza4w70TWP1SA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2203:: with SMTP id i3mr526304wmi.163.1616453090759; Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i17sm20646482wrp.77.2021.03.22.15.44.49 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:44:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::332; envelope-from=raaahh@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x332.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -14 X-Spam_score: -1.5 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.5 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266844 Archived-At: On 23.03.2021 00:02, Stefan Kangas wrote: > But if we're going to do that, `C-o' seems like a bad choice. If it is > to be worth changing this keybinding to anything, it should be to > `find-file'. That is, after all, what all other software assigns this > key to. I think something like this is only worthwhile if we were changing a whole bunch of bindings. Like not just C-o, but also C-n and C-s, to their "other software" counterparts. Perhaps not by default, but as a part of some "keybindings theme". Since the goal of the experiment was to free up the binding, that could've been beneficial in the context of such themes (the fewer important default bindings a theme touches, the fewer of them it has to reassign), but indeed not particularly critical given that C-o's current binding has no standard counterparts in other editors.