From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Phillip Lord" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 25.1 released Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 08:40:06 +0100 Message-ID: <1957e3858a8a8a006add3de6ed231839.squirrel@cloud103.planethippo.com> References: <87fuoyzbfu.fsf@petton.fr> <7685c68a-64e3-4c0b-85a6-109b49b1a938@default> <874m5ez55j.fsf@petton.fr> <8760puxl77.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474184473 4830 195.159.176.226 (18 Sep 2016 07:41:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 07:41:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN] Cc: Nicolas Petton , Kaushal Modi , emacs-devel , Drew Adams , Phillip Lord To: "Richard Copley" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 18 09:41:09 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1blWii-00080s-8t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 09:41:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49094 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blWig-0008JZ-It for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 03:40:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52620) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blWi0-0008JF-4o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 03:40:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blWhx-0003St-09 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 03:40:16 -0400 Original-Received: from cloud103.planethippo.com ([31.216.48.48]:42585) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1blWhw-0003Sk-Mn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 03:40:12 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=russet.org.uk; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Cc:To:From:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID; bh=Io3UXI9XsTtPQCbFGoNDkr/iHuMEC89ct296jG5Kotw=; b=k3OkvllfcZ9gzWu4uMgWuw8eIT gbTrXM/jJZnFwbmgnxoOXrviI2dIHFluv7S5YLWgfOZPio6UJ1KZy0EOoEbhYwhfpG4ZzRS37hH3b AmyWc2NXffy603kG14OIoNfW7seNGsSTfXkNKhVXXGtx1IOhy7Zs3k3yDm6JNo5sP5YQd5NUsTQd+ /rVO9myV6mzyzCkA9Xo/O0mHbFWVrss6ADT2O6idPX56KvQj6uduHG9QSsf6M0JPMpj1bU7IM7a2v pdngmplTIxbeCGTSLt+a1ySREERzLU56OcKKyg0QpSbJxmqAo1eBjpGYurvALuFowW++/llyUbq8N idxAhMeQ==; Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=35512 helo=cloud103.planethippo.com) by cloud103.planethippo.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1blWhq-001shZ-9h; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 08:40:06 +0100 Original-Received: from 92.234.125.50 ([92.234.125.50]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user phillip.lord@russet.org.uk) by cloud103.planethippo.com with HTTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 08:40:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cloud103.planethippo.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - russet.org.uk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: cloud103.planethippo.com: authenticated_id: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-Authenticated-Sender: cloud103.planethippo.com: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 31.216.48.48 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207526 Archived-At: On Sat, September 17, 2016 11:35 pm, Richard Copley wrote: >> I normally, test these binaries on a different machine from the one I >> build on, but I can't do that at the weekend. I'd be happy if some one >> can try them out (32 and 64 bit) and let me know if they are good. >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Phil >> > > They both launch fine on my machine, with an empty PATH, and work (at > least, for at few minutes of doing stuff) without any problems. Thanks for this! I'll release these this evening unless someone else complains