From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug spam Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:16:12 -0500 Message-ID: <19279.20828.784450.411540@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87iqb5o7ie.fsf@red-bean.com> <878wc1h524.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <874omph4f0.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87pr5dmqfw.fsf@red-bean.com> <877hrl1m5m.fsf@telefonica.net> <86hbqpctyh.fsf_-_@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263491299 20362 80.91.229.12 (14 Jan 2010 17:48:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 17:48:19 +0000 (UTC) To: Stefan Monnier , Óscar Fuentes , Karl Fogel , Emacs developers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 14 18:48:11 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NVTnm-0002pY-9K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:48:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55539 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVTnm-0000gq-Tp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:48:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVTTt-000411-ON for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:27:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NVTTo-0003sj-2O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:27:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55211 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NVTTn-0003sU-Rx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:27:31 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:49592) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NVTTn-0005NK-69 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:27:31 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NVTIq-00016y-RG; Thu, 14 Jan 2010 12:16:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: X-Attribution: GM X-Mailer: VM (www.wonderworks.com/vm), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs) X-Hue: yellow X-Ran: \E{Xk|Tjh>q)qW*5Co[j0QzIu{Y)Fx]5hAMlsAZTR9TX#Ja`do-nypy&tY`EeBOq$F>2Dl X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:120013 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote (on Thu, 14 Jan 2010 at 12:14 -0500): > > The current debbugs moderation is pretty taxing in human time, because > > of the enormous amount of spam that it gets. > > I don't think it's unmanageable. PS. How about auto-discarding mail sent to [0-9]-(close|done)@emacsbugs ? (Perhaps I'm fixated on this idea.)