From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: A Soare Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: REDO ? Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:28:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19198836.102491177406934035.JavaMail.www@wwinf4001> Reply-To: alinsoar@voila.fr NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177406946 3268 80.91.229.12 (24 Apr 2007 09:29:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:29:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: "Emacs Dev \[emacs-devel\]" To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 24 11:29:03 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HgHKX-0007Tn-I5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:29:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgHQ1-0006Wl-T4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:34:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgHPy-0006Wg-0q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:34:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HgHPx-0006WU-8p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:34:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HgHPx-0006WR-4n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:34:37 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp1.voila.fr ([193.252.22.174]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HgHKR-0007ea-A2; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 05:28:55 -0400 Original-Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf4001.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 16D4F58002AE; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:28:54 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from wwinf4001 (wwinf4001 [172.22.157.28]) by mwinf4001.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 0ABC75800277; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:28:54 +0200 (CEST) X-ME-UUID: 20070424092854440.0ABC75800277@mwinf4001.voila.fr X-Originating-IP: [89.34.170.37] X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-CC: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69913 Archived-At: > This would be good if it possible to implement it. I meant to see > in the minibuffer after applying an undo or a redo the text after > applying next an undo and the text after applying next a redo... I will occupy myself of the problem to write a patch after the release so: 1 -> C-u as parameter to UNDO command will reverse the direction from undo to redo or from redo to undo. 2 -> The current undo/redo will be inserted in the buffer with WHITE. 3 -> The previous UNDO/REDO will be inserted with RED. 4 -> And the next UNDO/REDO will be inserted with BLUE. 5 -> When WHITE and BLUE text will be superposed it will be shown in BLUE CIEL, WHITE+RED in LIGHT RED , etcetera. 6 -> pressing another key than the key associated with UNDO will keep permanent the WHITE text and will take out the RED and BLUE text. Alin Soare.