From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Cocoa Emacs (2) Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 20:32:57 +1200 Message-ID: <18582.48825.503895.175481@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <18576.17556.734610.263458@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <18579.36490.173388.721040@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217838820 12965 80.91.229.12 (4 Aug 2008 08:33:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 4 Aug 2008 08:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Adrian Robert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 04 10:34:30 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KPvWN-0006Zl-By for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 10:34:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43434 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KPvVR-0003TX-7Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:33:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KPvVK-0003RS-SU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:33:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KPvVJ-0003Ok-1e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:33:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48904 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KPvVI-0003Oa-Sg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:33:20 -0400 Original-Received: from viper.snap.net.nz ([202.37.101.25]:57151) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KPvVI-00081z-Ct for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Aug 2008 04:33:20 -0400 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (224.31.255.123.static.snap.net.nz [123.255.31.224]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D7F3DA2B6; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 20:33:10 +1200 (NZST) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6F19F8FC6D; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 20:32:58 +1200 (NZST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.2.50.3 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102027 Archived-At: > OK, running M-x gdb will lead to the bug, but M-x gud does not, > despite running same line (gdb --annotate=3 src/emacs in my case). OK, I see. > One difference I noticed is that when running via M-x gdb some status > is shown in the modeline, while via M-x gud does not. M-x gud-gdb is the old 'text-command' mode as in Emacs 21, while M-x gdb gives the GDB Graphical Interface as described in the manual. > I don't know a > tremendous amount about gud/gdb.. could there be some difference in > process-listening between the two different invocations? I think M-x gdb fails because of the extra ^M characters that are printed by gdb, as I reported earlier in: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-07/msg01421.html It appears that Mac different line endings to normal Unix/Linux just as w32 does, but this doesn't appear to cause a problem/be visible with Carbon Emacs. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob