line-move-visual never set to nil?

["T. V. Raman" <raman@users.sf.net>]

I'm very confused by the code in simple.el.

As reported a few minutes ago, turning off visual-line-mode has
no effect. The apparent reason being: line-move-visual remains
set to T and that is what the code in functions next-line and
previous-line refers to.

Is this a naming bug i.e. with the minor mode now called
visual-line-mode, should the variable be named visual-line-move
-- rather than line-move-visual?

Looking at the code that defines visual-line-mode -- I dont see
the line-move-visual getting set at any point; also, I see a
command to turn-on-visual-line-mode -- but no corresponding
command to turn it off.

Setting line-move-visual to nil does return emacs to its
traditional behavior where next-line and previous-line move
across   physical lines.

-- 
Best Regards,
--raman

      
Email:  raman@users.sf.net
WWW:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
AIM:    emacspeak       GTalk: tv.raman.tv@gmail.com
PGP:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Google: tv+raman 
IRC:    irc://irc.freenode.net/#emacs