From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: sand@blarg.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Accumulated fontset definition tweaks for testing Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 22:04:35 -0700 Message-ID: <18479.47331.91979.860369@priss.frightenedpiglet.com> References: <18477.2875.876651.446827@priss.frightenedpiglet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1211087132 19871 80.91.229.12 (18 May 2008 05:05:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 05:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sand@blarg.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Kenichi Handa Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 18 07:05:58 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jxb5U-0004M2-KU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 May 2008 07:05:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35912 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jxb4k-0007bg-MJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 18 May 2008 01:04:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jxb4d-0007ZU-Hd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 May 2008 01:04:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jxb4Z-0007Xz-FN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 May 2008 01:04:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=45361 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jxb4Z-0007Xp-9b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 May 2008 01:04:39 -0400 Original-Received: from v-static-143-234.avvanta.com ([206.124.143.234]:41046 helo=priss.frightenedpiglet.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jxb4Y-0001Yx-N0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 May 2008 01:04:39 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 6874 invoked by uid 1000); 18 May 2008 05:04:35 -0000 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.0.9 under Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) X-URL: http://home.blarg.net/~sand X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:97350 Kenichi Handa writes: > Thank you for them. I'm going reflect 1 to 3 in fontset.el. > I think 4 and 5 is not necessary if we implement > registry-representative-chars as I wrote in the previous > mail. I enabled simultaneous X and Xft backends using Emacs.FontBackend: xft,x and some of the non-Unicode characters showed display problems that didn't appear in an Xft-only configuration. They were falling back to other fonts even though my "normal" Neep Alt font had glyphs for them. I was able to fix the problems with some additional fontset definitions. ;; Needed to keep the non-Unicode Esperanto HELLO text from displaying ;; as Palladino. (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" 'latin (font-spec :registry "iso8859-3" :script 'latin) nil 'prepend) ;; Needed to keep the non-Unicode Russian HELLO text from displaying ;; as Palladino. (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" 'cyrillic (font-spec :registry "iso8859-5" :script 'cyrillic) nil 'prepend) ;; Needed to keep the non-Unicode Vietnamese HELLO text from displaying ;; in the Chinese font Ar Pl Zenkai Uni. (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" 'latin (font-spec :registry "viscii1.1-1" :script 'latin) nil 'prepend) ;; Needed to keep certain non-Unicode Greek HELLO text characters ;; from displaying in the Japanese font Sazanami Mincho (and showing ;; up blank on the screen). (set-fontset-font "fontset-default" 'greek (font-spec :registry "iso8859-7" :script 'greek) nil 'prepend) Does the order in which the drivers are specified in the resource have any effect on the behavior of Emacs? I wasn't able to see any difference between "x,xft" and "xft,x". Derek -- Derek Upham sand@blarg.net