From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Roland Winkler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: messages override minibuffer input Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:49:08 +0200 Message-ID: <18158.37860.82364.792281@tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de> References: <18146.9183.561171.347511@tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de> <18156.41397.801020.981025@tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1190040641 31984 80.91.229.10 (17 Sep 2007 14:50:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 14:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 17 16:49:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IXHur-0003Om-0S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:49:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXHvk-0005d1-Bw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:50:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IXHvg-0005cr-BD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:50:28 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IXHvZ-0005Yk-7X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:50:27 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IXHvZ-0005YZ-3Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:50:21 -0400 Original-Received: from tfkpsv.physik.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.164.197]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IXHv8-0000md-Eu; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 10:50:00 -0400 Original-Received: from tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de (tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.164.207]) by tfkpsv.physik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5886221138; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:49:09 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.1.1 X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:79110 Archived-At: On Sun Sep 16 2007 Richard Stallman wrote: > If I understand the code correctly, the function do_autoload in > eval.c normally calls load with arg NOMESSAGE being nil. So load > issues a message. Would it make sense that load used something like > optional-message? > > That change goes too far. In the case you describe, do_autoload > should not display the message. But in many other cases it should. Would it be better to do what Stefan proposed in a previous post? Another way to do it is to make such async-messages appear *after* the current minibuffer's content (typically enclosed on backets, as is done for completion messages). Roland