trunk version number

trunk version number

[Glenn Morris]

I've just noticed that the trunk still describes itself as Emacs
22.1.50, same as the release branch. Shouldn't the trunk be bumped to
23.0.50? For some reason, I thought this had already happened... I
think the trunk and release branch differ enough to need different
version numbers. I realize the unicode-2 branch has some existing 23.x
number.

Re: trunk version number

[Ulrich Mueller]

>>>>> On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Glenn Morris wrote:

> I've just noticed that the trunk still describes itself as Emacs
> 22.1.50, same as the release branch. Shouldn't the trunk be bumped
> to 23.0.50? For some reason, I thought this had already happened...

We had this discussion in June already, see 
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-06/msg00220.html>
where RMS suggested 22.50 for the trunk.

> I think the trunk and release branch differ enough to need different
> version numbers. I realize the unicode-2 branch has some existing
> 23.x number.

unicode-2 has 23.0.0, multi-tty has 23.0.51.

Ulrich

Re: trunk version number

[Glenn Morris]

Ulrich Mueller wrote:

> We had this discussion in June already, see 
> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-06/msg00220.html>

Thanks, I had a feeling it was somewhere but could not find it.

> where RMS suggested 22.50 for the trunk.

Surely that must be a typo?!

trunk version number

[T. V. Raman]

I asked this a couple of weeks ago and got ignored -- glad
someone else noticed it.

>>>>> "GM" == Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
    GM> I've just noticed that the trunk still describes itself
    GM> as Emacs 22.1.50, same as the release branch. Shouldn't
    GM> the trunk be bumped to 23.0.50? For some reason, I
    GM> thought this had already happened... I think the trunk
    GM> and release branch differ enough to need different
    GM> version numbers. I realize the unicode-2 branch has some
    GM> existing 23.x number.
    GM> 
    GM> 
    GM> _______________________________________________
    GM> Emacs-devel mailing list Emacs-devel@gnu.org
    GM> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel

-- 
Best Regards,
--raman

      
Email:  raman@users.sf.net
WWW:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/
AIM:    emacspeak       GTalk: tv.raman.tv@gmail.com
PGP:    http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc
Google: tv+raman 
IRC:    irc://irc.freenode.net/#emacs

Re: trunk version number

[Glenn Morris]

Glenn Morris wrote:

> Glenn Morris wrote:
>
>> I've just noticed that the trunk still describes itself as Emacs
>> 22.1.50, same as the release branch. Shouldn't the trunk be bumped to
>> 23.0.50?
>
> I think soon I will take silence to mean assent and do this.

The merger of multi-tty seemed a propitious time.

Re: trunk version number

[Ulrich Mueller]

>>>>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Glenn Morris wrote:

>>> I've just noticed that the trunk still describes itself as Emacs
>>> 22.1.50, same as the release branch. Shouldn't the trunk be bumped
>>> to 23.0.50?

>> I think soon I will take silence to mean assent and do this.

> The merger of multi-tty seemed a propitious time.

Wouldn't it be advisable to change also the version number for the
EMACS_22_BASE branch, to 22.1.51 for example?

Otherwise there is still an ambiguity between "old trunk" and "current
base branch" (e.g., in bug reports for version 22.1.50).

Ulrich

Trunk version number

[Dmitry Dzhus]

Am I correct when I use `23.2` for :version keyword of new customization
options I introduce in my code which will be eventually commited to the
current trunk?
-- 
Happy Hacking.

http://sphinx.net.ru
む

Re: Trunk version number

[Chong Yidong]

Dmitry Dzhus <dima@sphinx.net.ru> writes:

> Am I correct when I use `23.2` for :version keyword of new customization
> options I introduce in my code which will be eventually commited to the
> current trunk?

Yes.