From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel Colascione Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cc-mode fontification feels random Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 12:26:28 -0700 Message-ID: <179d87db6a0.2816.cc5b3318d7e9908e2c46732289705cb0@dancol.org> References: <831r9iw473.fsf@gnu.org> <2d6d1cb0-2e8f-ceea-cb83-3bb840b65115@dancol.org> <83zgw6udxt.fsf@gnu.org> <87czt1zzns.fsf@gmail.com> <83pmx1la8s.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16109"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: AquaMail/1.29.2-1810 (build: 102900008) Cc: joaotavora@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 04 21:30:02 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lpFW3-0003wx-SO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 21:30:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44470 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpFW2-00081j-NQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 15:29:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpFTN-0006T3-7F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 15:27:13 -0400 Original-Received: from dancol.org ([96.126.100.184]:58026) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lpFSi-0001Mh-L6; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 15:27:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dancol.org; s=x; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:CC:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GEJttmmEJHCP/6aT2zBEXiotz1IGHQ12Wia7YQnBW2U=; b=HSvskQ5wWnDi/BDBu4EzfK3+bg 7tfMIvDTJdWDGn8KiGqgHjpu2C/93OzvrnlTFCuTrkz+1qwPsRsuDpohNGbDD0DUJCTJdRcPEIDkx idGAQ1MW8km0MOqUGymM3eGEZZK0xlAMHHi+RCPg0PcMs2THcknlDR+U/fPLYVu5OYOZ5YGH82dGs 7ZiIVtAO0EX9KpE2zqLm8UWt5AH0MYxeWWwFK7OdFsX9ceEKswawvTOfhj9T36Hdqv6b/huJ7XtJR 4lnmfdHBlDFGBU5sK8JhqqcNlfKEM/kRQRD3I8HK+y7dclkCnrBtgEBI2j3xL4S7umq0oEl5SIw+u uA+tklFQ==; Original-Received: from 248.sub-174-204-83.myvzw.com ([174.204.83.248]:7395 helo=[100.107.68.200]) by dancol.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1lpFSg-0004mg-FG; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 12:26:30 -0700 In-Reply-To: <83pmx1la8s.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=96.126.100.184; envelope-from=dancol@dancol.org; helo=dancol.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:270403 Archived-At: On June 4, 2021 12:09:32 PM Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Stefan Monnier >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Daniel Colascione , >> emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 14:25:23 -0400 >> >>> But I don't understand what's stopping these tree-sitter C modules (like >>> [1] and [2]) to have access to the buffer's contents directly and have >>> the best of both worlds. >> >> I think it's a direct result of them being "modules" > > In the _real_ integration of those into Emacs, there's no reason for > them to be modules. Eh. There's a benefit to keeping components loosely coupled