From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Toolbar redraw causes unwanted selection Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:57:20 +1300 Message-ID: <17812.44608.337596.553060@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <5C56236E-6757-4AE1-A8AC-F61E0866E95F@as.arizona.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1167372160 23284 80.91.229.10 (29 Dec 2006 06:02:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:02:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, "Kim F.Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 29 07:02:38 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H0Ap9-00077y-6G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:02:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0Ap8-000186-Pr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 01:02:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0Aoo-00015i-87 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 01:02:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H0Aoj-00014O-8V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 01:02:12 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H0Aoj-00014L-01 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 01:02:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [202.37.101.8] (helo=viper.snap.net.nz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H0Aoe-0002m7-03; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 01:02:04 -0500 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-120-165.snap.net.nz [202.124.120.165]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19DC83D81A6; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:01:59 +1300 (NZDT) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id EE10EBE43F; Fri, 29 Dec 2006 18:57:22 +1300 (NZDT) Original-To: JD Smith In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.92.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:64410 Archived-At: > > Have you added more icons to the IDLWAVE tool-bar ? > > The default tool-bar doesn't need extra lines ... > > None have been added in several years. Perhaps you have the default > Emacs editing toolbar icons disabled? Normally, IDLWAVE's icons are > appended to these (since they are valid in an idlwave-mode buffer), > causing the toolbar resize for normal frame widths and font sizes. > Is it possible this is the only mode which appends enough to the > normal editing set to wrap? I find it hard to believe. How about making IDLWAVE *replace* the default icons? I don't know if it's a good analogy but that's what I do in GUD. The default icons could be used in the source buffers but I don't think they're as useful, and when the debug session is killed the default icons appear again. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob