From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Keybinding nit Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:19:02 +1300 Message-ID: <17719.60358.608003.415676@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <85d58p7hyu.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85irig78t9.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <17719.56017.158858.353004@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <85vemgowxv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161360689 22804 80.91.229.2 (20 Oct 2006 16:11:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 16:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 20 18:11:25 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gawxm-0001gy-1w for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:11:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gawxl-0007UA-1c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:11:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GafL8-0000DX-9G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GafL7-00009v-CS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:22:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GafL7-00009Q-91 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:22:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [202.37.101.8] (helo=viper.snap.net.nz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GafL3-0004oz-Hu; Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:22:05 -0400 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-124-108.snap.net.nz [202.124.124.108]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDC67BA0D9; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:22:02 +1300 (NZDT) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id A509CBE453; Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:19:04 +1300 (NZDT) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <85vemgowxv.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.27 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60932 Archived-At: > > If you mean move C-x 4 0 to C-x 5 k, I agree. (I'm not sure what you want > > C-x 4 k to do). > > Serves me right. If it weren't for disagreement, I'd have no > agreement at all. I'd have proposed to move C-x 4 0 > (`kill-buffer-and-window') to C-x 4 k and have C-x 5 k be mapped to > `kill-buffer-and-frame' (which does not yet exist). Sorry, I misunderstood what C-x 4 0 does (I don't use it). Yes, C-x 5 k for kill-buffer-and-frame seems a good idea. -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob