Re: Keybinding nit

[Nick Roberts <nickrob@snap.net.nz>]

 > >     C-x 4 0 and C-x 5 0 are not at all symmetric, and C-x 4 0 is not
 > >     really intuitive.
 > >
 > >     Maybe one should rather have C-x 4 k and C-x 5 k for killing both
 > >     buffer and window/frame?
 > >
 > > Since C-x k reads a buffer name, I would expect C-x 4 k to
 > > read a buffer name also.
 > 
 > Well, I wouldn't (there are quite a few keybindings where "k" just
 > kills something).  And since neither C-x 0 nor C-x 5 0 kills a buffer,
 > I would not expect C-x 4 0 to do it, either.
 > 
 > It all boils down to what feels more natural and expected.  Of course
 > that is a matter of personal taste, and I like to think my taste is
 > not too far out here.  Other opinions?

If you mean move C-x 4 0 to C-x 5 k, I agree.  (I'm not sure what you want
C-x 4 k to do).

-- 
Nick                                           http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob