From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Aidan Kehoe Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [simon.marshall@misys.com: Font Lock on-the-fly misfontification in C++] Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 16:12:35 +0200 Message-ID: <17616.45779.197734.139761@parhasard.net> References: <20060723142630.GB1433@muc.de> <20060731220419.GF1271@muc.de> <17616.29352.887502.516153@parhasard.net> <85mzanwjct.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <17616.32316.759027.971436@parhasard.net> <85ac6nwdt7.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1154528025 32415 80.91.229.2 (2 Aug 2006 14:13:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 14:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 02 16:13:40 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8HSq-00065Y-8X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 16:12:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8HSp-0005f0-Ky for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:12:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G8HSe-0005eM-Pz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:12:36 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G8HSd-0005dz-1L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:12:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8HSc-0005dv-S8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:12:34 -0400 Original-Received: from [66.111.49.30] (helo=icarus.asclepian.ie) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G8HVk-00046I-RW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Aug 2006 10:15:48 -0400 Original-Received: by icarus.asclepian.ie (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 51D1F8008F; Wed, 2 Aug 2006 15:12:35 +0100 (IST) Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" (+CVS-20060717) XEmacs Lucid X-Echelon-distraction: Siemens class struggle W3 MDA SATCOMA VLSI X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:58005 Archived-At: Ar an dara l=C3=A1 de m=C3=AD L=C3=BAnasa, scr=C3=ADobh Stefan Monnier:=20 > People, can we move on to something else? It's not like someone's goi= ng to > change his mind anyway. The Emacs camp wants to call their editor "Em= acs" > and the XEmacs camp wants to call their editor "XEmacs". That's that. That=E2=80=99s not that. RMS and other developers of his branch of the ed= itor regularly call it both Emacs and GNU Emacs in many and varied contexts an= d express the opinion that other people should avoid the second term in a recent, cited context where RMS has used it (that is, to distinguish it from other versions of the editor.)=20 > Now whether you want to respect their wishes is up to you. Also a matter of individual choice is one=E2=80=99s opinion on what telli= ng people to do what you say, not what you do is best described as. --=20 Santa Maradona, priez pour moi!