From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Drew Adams Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: [PATCH] About the :distant-foreground face attribute Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:06:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <174db5f5-db14-4484-a2f9-9478d2f5fea1@default> References: <87bnzo9cja.fsf@gnu.org> <59B7E7FC-48D0-4737-B1BB-FFAC5BA9E07A@swipnet.se> <874n5f3162.fsf@gnu.org> <83fvozf86g.fsf@gnu.org> <87r48javwe.fsf@gnu.org> <83bnzmfjxe.fsf@gnu.org> <52D3E689.6050902@dancol.org> <8E16225F-53EF-498A-AB35-66EB9B33B859@swipnet.se> <52D43360.6050605@dancol.org> <9BD01B88-AF13-44DD-8DBE-4598BAC136DD@swipnet.se> <52D45C73.6090906@dancol.org> <52D4EBA9.8050802@swipnet.se> <52D4F2C2.8080800@dancol.org> <52D504A7.80104@swipnet.se> <52D514FF.7010404@dancol.org> <52D52312.6070106@swipnet.se> <52D58632.3010106@dancol.org> <381DEBDC-71D8-4FAC-BA55-897FEC73A2FC@swipnet.se> <52D5A072.5010508@dancol.org> <064CFFB5-6E50-40D5-B2CB-2BECC656D93F@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389737220 20625 80.91.229.3 (14 Jan 2014 22:07:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Chong Yidong , emacs-devel To: =?iso-8859-1?B?SmFuIERq5HJ2?= , Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 14 23:07:06 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W3C8W-0000HP-Ka for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 23:07:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50912 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3C8W-0004B2-67 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:07:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36961) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3C83-0003fA-VA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:06:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3C7v-0002ZF-Ef for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:06:35 -0500 Original-Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:44263) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3C7m-0002VV-8B; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:06:18 -0500 Original-Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.2) with ESMTP id s0EM6AMM014215 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:06:10 GMT Original-Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.5+Sun/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0EM68TX019799 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:06:09 GMT Original-Received: from abhmp0009.oracle.com (abhmp0009.oracle.com [141.146.116.15]) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0EM684K007132; Tue, 14 Jan 2014 22:06:08 GMT In-Reply-To: <064CFFB5-6E50-40D5-B2CB-2BECC656D93F@swipnet.se> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.8 (707110) [OL 12.0.6680.5000 (x86)] X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 141.146.126.69 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:168402 Archived-At: > But I always assumed we are talking post-release here as your code > clearly don't belong in a feature freeze. Nor does your code that introduced this regression. Please restore the behavior as it was before this "fix" for a nonexistent "bug".