From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Display feature request: gud-overlay-arrow Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:59:12 +1200 Message-ID: <17443.6704.531929.398868@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <17439.13250.269939.241145@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17439.31049.393782.938907@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17439.55042.159116.120699@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17442.25451.927114.415243@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1143485232 9906 80.91.229.2 (27 Mar 2006 18:47:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:47:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 27 20:47:10 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNwjs-0006tH-7g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 20:46:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNwjr-0006WH-SU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:46:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FMXrP-0001ZC-EU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:00:51 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FMXrO-0001Z0-Ao for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:00:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FMXrO-0001Yx-4Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:00:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [202.37.101.8] (helo=viper.snap.net.nz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FMXs3-0002nF-Iw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:01:32 -0500 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p202-124-114-35.snap.net.nz [202.124.114.35]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DFA74A61A; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:00:44 +1200 (NZST) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 1734688EE; Fri, 24 Mar 2006 09:59:14 +1200 (NZST) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.87 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:52098 Archived-At: > That's because the code which puts the breakpoint bitmap in the > left fringe explicitly specifies the face (breakpoint-enabled > or breakpoint-disabled) for the bitmap: OK > > Can it be made to work for standard bitmaps? e.g to make the overlay arrow > > (right-triangle) white (as Miles described). > > Did you try it? Well I thought I did but perhaps I had re-defined right-triangle or something at the time. > However, if you really want to do this, you should define a new > white-overlay-arrow bitmap and give it a white face -- then, when you > know overlay is above a breakpoint bitmap, you could explicitly map > overlay-arrow to white-overlay-arrow in fringe-indicator-alist. It seems to work better than a black arrow provided the fringes are a bit darker (grey85 or less). Could we make this change or are people too attached to the status quo? (grey85 is lighter than mode-line but darker than mode-line-inactive). -- Nick http://www.inet.net.nz/~nickrob