From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "R. Bernstein" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gud.el organization and adding debuggers Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:02:33 -0500 Message-ID: <17382.48201.936822.850306@panix3.panix.com> References: <20060205174024.2BCBB9DB3E@mail2.panix.com> Reply-To: rocky@panix.com NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1139194976 21340 80.91.229.2 (6 Feb 2006 03:02:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 03:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 04:02:54 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F5weO-0003tw-Bf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2006 04:02:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F5whf-0003ac-HR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:06:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F5whU-0003aM-EX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:06:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F5whS-0003aA-Vk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:06:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F5whS-0003a7-SM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:05:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [166.84.1.72] (helo=mail1.panix.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F5wgw-0003fo-Of for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2006 22:05:26 -0500 Original-Received: from panix3.panix.com (panix3.panix.com [166.84.1.3]) by mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B3B59EB7 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:02:34 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from rocky@localhost) by panix3.panix.com (8.11.6p3/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id k1632YA11665; Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:02:34 -0500 (EST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20060205174024.2BCBB9DB3E@mail2.panix.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.3.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:50074 Archived-At: Nick Roberts in response to Stefan Monnier's remark: > > I think a good first step would be to kill gud-def. > > ... > Yes. Lets do it after the release. Ha! ha! I have a proposal that isn't as drastic and helps at least in the situations I've encountered. And I think it could be done in such a way that there isn't any chance of negative impact. Basically, I propose that the bash debugger code that was added for this release now be put in a separate file, say bashdb.el, in the same directory as gud.el. In other words the bashdb.el that is currently getting distributed anyway would just be added as part of the Emacs distribution.