From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: log-view documentation Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:59:07 +1300 Message-ID: <17287.35115.348318.382737@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <17284.9087.508309.641956@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17285.22648.602817.559583@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1132956132 18018 80.91.229.2 (25 Nov 2005 22:02:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 25 23:02:09 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eflcw-0001IB-44 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:01:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Eflcu-0008Sj-VV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:01:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EflbH-0007gH-Ig for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:59:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EflbE-0007df-L0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:59:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EflbE-0007dI-88 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:59:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [202.37.101.8] (helo=viper.snap.net.nz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Eflb9-0001D9-LY; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:59:16 -0500 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p72-tnt1.snap.net.nz [202.124.110.72]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B4972F7E2; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:59:08 +1300 (NZDT) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 39F568425; Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:59:08 +1300 (NZDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46583 Archived-At: > Since J annotates the revision indicated by the current line, wouldn't > it be redundant for A to do that too? And wouldn't C-u A be less > convenient than A? > > But since I don't use this feature, I don't have a strong opinion. I have been trying it, but find it hard to use. It might be helpful to have Info like navigation (albeit slow) and retain buffers with earlier versions. But I don't really use it either, so let's leave it as it is. Nick