From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bill Wohler Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.mail.mh-e.devel Subject: Re: [Savannah-help-public] Re: The MH-E repository Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:49:08 -0700 Organization: Newt Software Message-ID: <17273.1128120548@olgas.newt.com> References: <25625.1117492799@olgas.newt.com> <26501.1117644627@olgas.newt.com> <14469.1117737139@olgas.newt.com> <16390.1117841114@olgas.newt.com> <20050604094437.GA21562@localhost.localdomain> <28577.1117901617@olgas.newt.com> <20050604165220.GA9284@localhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1128122194 9480 80.91.229.2 (30 Sep 2005 23:16:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 23:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 01 01:16:23 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELU6f-0003Ft-1m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 01:15:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELU6e-0002Fk-Dc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:15:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ELU06-0000w4-UT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:09:11 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ELU05-0000vK-Hk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:09:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ELTyZ-00009Y-Qe; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 19:07:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [207.69.195.68] (helo=pop-cowbird.atl.sa.earthlink.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ELTgm-0000xV-CH; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:49:12 -0400 Original-Received: from h-68-166-188-126.snvacaid.dynamic.covad.net ([68.166.188.126] helo=olgas.newt.com) by pop-cowbird.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1ELTgk-0005IJ-00; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:49:10 -0400 Original-Received: by olgas.newt.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 719FB16FE1; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from olgas.newt.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olgas.newt.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2CA16FB1; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 15:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-To: mh-e-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org, savannah-hackers@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Sylvain Beucler's message of Sat, 04 Jun 2005 18:52:20 +0200. <20050604165220.GA9284@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: MH-E 7.84+cvs; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 21.4.1 X-Image-URL: http://www.newt.com/wohler/images/bill-diving.png X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:43409 gmane.mail.mh-e.devel:10632 Archived-At: Sylvain Beucler wrote: > On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 09:13:37AM -0700, Bill Wohler wrote: > > Miles Bader wrote: > > > > > On 6/4/05, Sylvain Beucler wrote: > > > > Considering that you want lisp/mh-e to notify both mh-e-devel and > > > > emacs-commit, this is currently not possible in the current setup, > > > > mainly because CVS's loginfo only matches one configuration file line, > > > > and each line call our notification script that only accept 1 e-mail > > > > address per kind of notifications (diff / nodiff). > > > > > > As a work-around, you could have it send to an alias (I mean one in > > > /etc/aliases or equivalent) which in turn just forwards to both lists. > > > > That's true. What might be a better alternative is that I could (and > > probably should) set up an mh-e-commits mailing list. I'd add > > emacs-commits to that list. > > > > At first I thought that the Emacs folks would not really be interested > > in seeing the MH-E commits, but perhaps that would not be the case. > > > > However, if the Emacs maintainers don't even *want* to have an > > emacs-commits mailing list, then this is a moot point. Do they? > > The FSF set up an anti-spam rule that block mail "from AND to mailing > lists" :/ > > However I/Miles/... should be able to setup an alias at fencepost :) > Indeed. > > Please tell me what you decide (whether commits should go to both > mailing lists or only mh-e-devel). Sylvain, It's time to proceed with this. But first, a couple of quick questions. I have not been able to find (your version of) the log_accum.pl script to confirm, but the following email implies that we might be able to say -m emacs-commit -m mh-e-devel on the command line: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2001-11/msg01079.html Then there's the question of the -D option as well. Also, is there an option to generate unified diffs instead of context diffs? With large hunks, it's impossible to compare the changes in context diffs. -- Bill Wohler http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.