From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el? Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:14:54 +1300 Message-ID: <17250.38094.341063.582730@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <17243.21638.138477.436126@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17244.34246.93773.562211@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17245.17271.523511.307415@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17246.47395.926373.263704@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17247.17729.366833.431749@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87oe59oqro.fsf@robotron.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130534200 4661 80.91.229.2 (28 Oct 2005 21:16:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 28 23:16:32 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVbYv-0002Iw-Hm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:14:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVbYu-0007On-NK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:14:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EVbYM-0006so-0l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:14:22 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EVbYJ-0006pr-Ni for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:14:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EVbYJ-0006pH-90 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:14:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [202.37.101.8] (helo=viper.snap.net.nz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EVbYJ-0001rv-0t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:14:19 -0400 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p113-tnt1.snap.net.nz [202.124.110.113]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F3372EA64; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:14:15 +1300 (NZDT) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 14DF583AE; Sat, 29 Oct 2005 10:14:55 +1300 (NZDT) Original-To: David Hansen In-Reply-To: <87oe59oqro.fsf@robotron.ath.cx> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.25 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:45049 Archived-At: > > I don't think I understand the issues. I thought if I used the > > keyword inline e.g "inline int mysquare (int x)", I would get > > an inline function. Perhaps thats not the case because I can > > set a breakpoint, stop there and see mysquare in the stack. > > Just curious: How can gcc inline a non static function? I guess it takes the machine code for mysquare and copies it into the machine code of the executable at locations where it is called. What problems can you see? Nick