From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New function for gdb-ui.el? Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:26:31 +1300 Message-ID: <17245.17271.523511.307415@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> References: <17243.21638.138477.436126@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17244.34246.93773.562211@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130185852 14172 80.91.229.2 (24 Oct 2005 20:30:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 20:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Frank Schmitt , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 22:30:50 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EU8xU-0005QU-4K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:30:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EU8xT-0000ro-K6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EU8xG-0000rj-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EU8xF-0000rX-4H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EU8xE-0000rU-VA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:30:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [202.37.101.8] (helo=viper.snap.net.nz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EU8x8-0004XG-3H; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:29:54 -0400 Original-Received: from kahikatea.snap.net.nz (p206-tnt1.snap.net.nz [202.124.110.206]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100D6731159; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:29:48 +1300 (NZDT) Original-Received: by kahikatea.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0C654840A; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 09:26:33 +1300 (NZDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44757 Archived-At: > > It could go on mouse-2 which has some kind of goto idiom. Do you > > think it should it be restricted to the buffer with the overlay arrow > > or work on any file which is part of the source code of the GDB > > session. > > I'd restrict it to the former. > > To move to another file usually means moving to another frame, and > that's not the job of `until'. This command should refuse > to move to another frame. Yes, you're right. I hadn't tried it and just used the fact that it takes the same kind of argument as break. > But there is an exception: when a function in one file is inlined in > another. In that case, shouldn't this command work? If I try it, it doesn't seem to work. Even if it, I'm not sure how we would make use of it. Nick