From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: A Soare <alinsoar@voila.fr>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: REDO ?
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:46:43 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <17190643.437781177343203022.JavaMail.www@wwinf4203>
Reply-To: alinsoar@voila.fr
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177343219 6746 80.91.229.12 (23 Apr 2007 15:46:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:46:59 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "Emacs   Dev  \[emacs-devel\]" <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
To: rms@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 23 17:46:52 2007
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Hg0kb-000189-IR
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:46:49 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Hg0q1-0006T8-3B
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:52:25 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Hg0py-0006T3-G8
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:52:22 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1Hg0px-0006Sr-Vu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:52:22 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hg0px-0006So-Ty
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:52:21 -0400
Original-Received: from smtp3.voila.fr ([193.252.22.173])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <alinsoar@voila.fr>)
	id 1Hg0kW-0001fW-LY; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:46:44 -0400
Original-Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mwinf4201.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 152481C00088;
	Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:46:43 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from wwinf4203 (wwinf4203 [10.232.2.30])
	by mwinf4201.voila.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 082D91C00082;
	Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:46:43 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: 20070423154643335.082D91C00082@mwinf4201.voila.fr
X-Originating-IP: [89.34.170.37]
X-Wum-Nature: EMAIL-NATURE
X-WUM-FROM: |~|
X-WUM-TO: |~|
X-WUM-CC: |~|
X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~|
X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:69864
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/69864>

> I think it is a bad idea to have a separate redo command,
> simply because there is no room on the keyboard for a
> convenient one, and an inconvenient one won't do much good.
> 

Not different. Just the same, but to be possible to reverse the direction of the yank (using a parameter for example), even from the beginning of the action, not to be obliged first to apply an undo, etcetera.