From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs -Q not documented Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:48:15 +1200 Message-ID: <16979.37951.139151.443874@farnswood.snap.net.nz> References: <20050329.162832.71106586.wl@gnu.org> <20050402.084718.31638992.wl@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1112774084 10912 80.91.229.2 (6 Apr 2005 07:54:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 07:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 06 09:54:40 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ5MS-0004Up-7h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 09:54:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ4vV-0003fY-Nt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:26:13 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ4qq-0002gM-Dn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:21:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DJ4qp-0002d1-4Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:21:23 -0400 Original-Received: from [202.37.101.8] (helo=viper.snap.net.nz) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DJ5HS-0004Rx-Rl; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 03:48:55 -0400 Original-Received: from farnswood.snap.net.nz (p207-tnt2.snap.net.nz [202.124.108.207]) by viper.snap.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901734ABD3B; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 19:48:28 +1200 (NZST) Original-Received: by farnswood.snap.net.nz (Postfix, from userid 501) id 08AE962A99; Wed, 6 Apr 2005 08:48:15 +0100 (BST) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 22.0.50.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35611 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35611 > The -Q option has saved me many hours debugging rediplay problems! If Kim finds this option useful then it surely makes sense to keep it? It presumably carries no overhead and, AFAIK, initial options aren't a limited resource . If no-one else finds it useful, why are we arguing about adding a long name for it? Nick