From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kyle Jones Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: VM and find-face Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:42:49 -0800 Message-ID: <16861.45273.244285.279310@cocoa.WonderWorks.COM> References: <16861.24082.521425.279155@notch.amtp.cam.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1105047895 20016 80.91.229.6 (6 Jan 2005 21:44:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 21:44:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 06 22:44:46 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CmfR0-0000oK-00 for ; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 22:44:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CmfcK-00076s-9F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:56:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cmfc4-00076W-2p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:56:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cmfc2-00075k-FM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:56:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cmfc2-00075O-Ak for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:56:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.203.206.2] (helo=ice.WonderWorks.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1CmfPS-0003g3-9n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Jan 2005 16:43:10 -0500 Original-Received: from cocoa.WonderWorks.COM by ice.WonderWorks.com with ESMTP (peer crosschecked as: cocoa.WonderWorks.COM [192.203.206.88]) id j06LgqEf054703; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:42:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by cocoa.WonderWorks.COM (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5FC639BA25D; Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:42:49 -0800 (PST) Original-To: Stephen Eglen In-Reply-To: <16861.24082.521425.279155@notch.amtp.cam.ac.uk> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under 21.4 (patch 15) "Security Through Obscurity" XEmacs Lucid X-Face: /cA45WHG7jWq>(O3&Z57Y<"WsX5ddc,4c#w0F*zrV#=M 0@~@,s;b,aMtR5Sqs"+nU.z^CSFQ9t`z2>W,S,]:[+2^ Nbf6v4g>!&,7R4Ot4Wg{&tm=WX7P["9%a)_da48-^tGy ,qz]Z,Zz\{E.,]'EO+F)@$KtF&V X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31978 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31978 I'd prefer it if find-face returned nil. Returning nil is better for functions that aren't going to be used interactively unless you're going to signal a unique condition like end-of-buffer or wrong-number-of-arguments. But the code is easy to fix so it doesn't matter much one way or the other.