From: Roland Winkler <roland.winkler@physik.uni-erlangen.de>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>,
Alex Schroeder <alex@emacswiki.org>
Subject: Re: [roland.winkler@physik.uni-erlangen.de: documentation bug: customization type `option']
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 16:57:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16616.6890.589923.966980@tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040704023137.GA16549@fencepost>
On Sat, Jul 03, 2004 at 02:21:19PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote:
> It is not worth writing text in the manual for internal facilities.
> Writing good manual text is hard work, and I don't want to do it
> when it's not needed.
Maybe this depends on the point of view. Being the maintainer of a
high-level package I feel like the user of the low-level stuff such as
widgets. So I am grateful when the low-level stuff is well documented
and I need not spend too much time digging in its source code.
On Sat Jul 3 2004 Miles Bader wrote:
> What about just saying somethign like `some other widget types
> exist, and are documented in their doc-string, for instance: <list
> of widget types>'.
>
> [Of course some of these widgets may be undocumented for good
> reason -- e.g., they are incompletely implemented or something
> (perhaps working only in the specific case where they are used).]
I think that's a good idea. I spent a little time trying to make
sure that I didn't overlook anything in the info files. So if
there had been such a remark, it would have saved me some time.
Roland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-04 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-01 17:14 [roland.winkler@physik.uni-erlangen.de: documentation bug: customization type `option'] Richard Stallman
2004-07-02 9:19 ` Alex Schroeder
2004-07-02 12:14 ` Roland Winkler
2004-07-03 18:21 ` Richard Stallman
2004-07-04 2:31 ` Miles Bader
2004-07-04 14:57 ` Roland Winkler [this message]
2004-07-07 16:34 ` Per Abrahamsen
2004-07-08 23:18 ` Richard Stallman
2004-07-09 6:46 ` Per Abrahamsen
2004-07-09 6:50 ` David Kastrup
2004-07-09 18:02 ` Stefan
2004-07-10 7:31 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16616.6890.589923.966980@tfkp07.physik.uni-erlangen.de \
--to=roland.winkler@physik.uni-erlangen.de \
--cc=alex@emacswiki.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).