From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Eli Zaretskii" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rmail changes for Emacs 22 Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:48:46 +0300 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <1659-Tue22Oct2002214846+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <200210201940.g9KJeqW12529@rum.cs.yale.edu> <84iszvvv8h.fsf@crybaby.cs.uni-dortmund.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035316219 23229 80.91.224.249 (22 Oct 2002 19:50:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 19:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18452e-000625-00 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:50:16 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 184540-000105-00 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:51:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18450u-0005Sz-00; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:48:28 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 1844zf-0002Ec-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:47:11 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 1844zd-0002E6-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:47:10 -0400 Original-Received: from odin.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1844zd-0002Dp-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:47:09 -0400 Original-Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.194.148]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.0-GA) with ESMTP id AQN57956; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:46:47 +0200 (IST) Original-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE X-Mailer: emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 In-reply-to: <84iszvvv8h.fsf@crybaby.cs.uni-dortmund.de> (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:8667 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:8667 > From: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai =?iso-8859-1?q?Gro=DFjohann?=) > Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 08:33:02 +0200 > > > It is impossible to display the message text without decoding it from > > whatever coding system it is encoded in. > > I think that's what Eli meant: an incoming message is already encoded > in some way, and Eli suggested to just leave it like that and to > decode on viewing. Almost. There are the cases where the existing charset= header lies. A user can then do a "M-x rmail-redecode-body RET ENCODING RET", and get the message decoded differently. I think in these cases Emacs should rewrite the charset= header according to the new encoding.