From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggested experimental test Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:37:59 +0200 Message-ID: <164F3FEC-FBD2-4BD7-A6C4-BD195DC54D50@gnu.org> References: <936DFE4B-B16D-45A2-A6C2-AF13C451BF39@bydasein.com> <87tup1dk63.fsf@gnus.org> <20210324085114.GC30513@tuxteam.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21166"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android Cc: gregory@heytings.org, "Paul W. Rankin" , "Paul W. Rankin via Emacs development discussions." To: emacs-devel@gnu.org,tomas@tuxteam.de,Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 24 11:39:02 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lP0uj-0005Nd-Fn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:39:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47286 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lP0ui-00051Q-DU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 06:39:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39640) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lP0tp-00045h-9p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 06:38:05 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:51737) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lP0tn-0004Nb-Ro; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 06:38:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [2a02:14f:1ff:a9d2::20d0:81d5] (port=36408) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lP0tm-00035u-QC; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 06:38:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20210324085114.GC30513@tuxteam.de> X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:266940 Archived-At: On March 24, 2021 10:51:14 AM GMT+02:00, tomas@tuxteam=2Ede wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 09:34:44AM +0100, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > > "Paul W=2E Rankin" via "Emacs development discussions=2E" > > writes: > >=20 > > >> May I suggest the attached, slightly more controversial, > experimental test? > > > > > > Along this same vein, I suggest that we unbind the `e' key from > > > self-insert-command and instead make it insert the string "Emacs " > 17 > > > times, e=2Eg=2E > >=20 > > This isn't helpful=2E People should be able to make suggestions on > > emacs-devel without being ridiculed, and stuff like this makes > > emacs-devel seem like a very hostile environment=2E >=20 > Agreed=2E There is a lot of ungood karma around in this thread, which > is a pity=2E "A lot"? Aren't we exaggerating a bit? This thread amassed more than 150= messages; how many of them can be qualified as "ungood karma"?