From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ian Jackson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior? Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:40:51 +0000 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <16405.6371.146753.920453@chiark.greenend.org.uk> References: <877jzn2lk8.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <16401.5059.249741.523854@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <16404.63472.223534.499091@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <876E93D9-5003-11D8-BC55-00039363E640@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1075126541 10120 80.91.224.253 (26 Jan 2004 14:15:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:15:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Simon Josefsson , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 26 15:15:31 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Al7WV-0003uR-00 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:15:31 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Al7WV-0006jf-00 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 15:15:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Al7Mq-0007K2-KK for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:05:32 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1Al7Db-0004kk-5Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:55:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1Al6z3-0008Gb-VH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:41:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [193.201.200.170] (helo=chiark.greenend.org.uk) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Al6z2-0008F8-IN; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 08:40:56 -0500 Original-Received: by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with local id 1Al6yx-0005Mz-00; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 13:40:51 +0000 Original-To: "Jan D." In-Reply-To: <876E93D9-5003-11D8-BC55-00039363E640@swipnet.se> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under Emacs 19.34.1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:19483 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:19483 Jan D. writes ("Re: sendmail.el bug or expected behavior?"): > The point is if this is changed, there will be places where Emacs > previously did deliver mail, and now no longer does. It is an > incompatible change, not to be made lightly IMHO. Currently there are large numbers of places where Emacs sometimes loses mail ! Ian.