From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: reducing defface redundancy
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 10:14:18 +0300
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <161-Sat20Apr2002101418+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
References: <877kn3qczq.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp>
Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019287643 24932 127.0.0.1 (20 Apr 2002 07:27:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 07:27:23 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16ypHH-0006U1-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 09:27:23 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 16ypb1-0007Fh-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 09:47:47 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16ypH5-0000Z0-00; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 03:27:11 -0400
Original-Received: from balder.inter.net.il ([192.114.186.15])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16ypEl-00005I-00; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 03:24:47 -0400
Original-Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.2.40])
	by balder.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 2.9.3.2)
	with ESMTP id BIC01074;
	Sat, 20 Apr 2002 10:23:41 +0300 (IDT)
Original-To: miles@gnu.org
X-Mailer: emacs 21.2.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
In-Reply-To: <877kn3qczq.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> (message from Miles
	Bader on 20 Apr 2002 12:12:57 +0900)
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2820
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2820

> From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
> Date: 20 Apr 2002 12:12:57 +0900
> 
> (defface subtle-yet-underlined-mode-line
>   '(:inherit mode-line
>     :underline t
>     (((background light) :background "grey90")
>      ((background dark)  :background "grey10"))))
> 
> So what'ya think?  It shouldn't be hard to implement, given the
> existance of `display-capable-p', it's backward-compatible, and whizzy
> as all hell (well, I think so anyway)...

I'm not sure this will make defface's we have less redundant and
repetitive, but I think the feature as such can be useful.