From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alexander Adolf Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] EUDC email addresses via completion-at-point in message-mode Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 18:22:24 +0200 Message-ID: <15d9b53d21333f441fa3f636f51c9daf@condition-alpha.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="38508"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 03 18:38:21 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nlvXY-0009pU-Vr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 18:38:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38988 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nlvXX-0000mp-FY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 12:38:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nlvIE-0005v2-8V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 12:22:30 -0400 Original-Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.29]:41706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nlvIC-0007FV-Gc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 12:22:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [46.244.223.247] (helo=condition-alpha.com) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nlvIC-0003Gu-FA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 18:22:28 +0200 In-Reply-To: X-Df-Sender: YWxleGFuZGVyLmFkb2xmQGNvbmRpdGlvbi1hbHBoYS5jb20= Received-SPF: pass client-ip=80.67.18.29; envelope-from=alexander.adolf@condition-alpha.com; helo=smtprelay06.ispgateway.de X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:289111 Archived-At: Hello, Alexander Adolf writes: > [...] > Thanks for pointing these out, and for helping to improve the proposed > patch! > > Then there was a wider discussion on potential, architectural > improvements of completion handling in message.el. > > Before diving into this wider discussion, it would seem worthwhile to me > trying to get to a conclusion on the proposed patch. > > Do we have a consensus, that the proposed, updated patch does not solve > all potential issues around email address completion in message mode > once and for all, but that it still provides a useful improvement for > some users without disturbing others, thus making it seem worthwhile to > include the patch? > [...] After some further help from Filipp Gunbin (setq-local removed, re-serach-backward simplified), for which "Thanks, Filipp!", it seems I'm back at the above question ("Do we have a consensus...") with respect to my proposed patch. Do we have consensus? Many thanks and looking forward to your thoughts, --alexander